Unfortunately, the water's edge measures for the new corona seem to have failed. No, since it is a water-by-the-water strategy not to collapse the medical system, there will still be voices that it is hard to say that failure, but from the fact that it has become firm enough to panic, also because it is failing, such as the inspection system, At least it would be hard to say success.
There are various voices, but the important thing is to take advantage of the lessons and connect them to the next one.
It is regrettable that it was not possible to do it because it would agree with the responsibility and the anarchist that the country fulfills the duty and the public health in addition to the military and diplomacy in addition to the minimum role of the country. Public health in particular has a limit to leaving it to individuals, and it is necessary to have a national response (at least a certain amount of collective response, such as a union system). This time should be prepared as a lesson next.
This time it is a very inappropriate expression, but there is still a point where it can not be said that it was good with the new corona. In part, the new corona is an artificial virus, or a biological weapon, and it is noisy with the outflow of the failure of the biological weapon, but if it is a real biological weapon attack, it is far from the present state.
Depending on the application, if it is a national-level biological weapons attack,
1Even if infected, the person in question does not notice for the time being (the hiding period is long)
(2) There are carriers who do not develop but have infectivity
(3) Infection is maintained even without symptoms
4 If possible air infection, at least splash infection
(5) Strong killing ability or long-term hospitalization leading to death relatively early when onset
(6) Immediately similar to an existing virus, etc. that is not noticed as an artificial virus
(7) changes in initial symptoms and medical conditions are similar to other existing diseases, it is difficult to distinguish.
(8) Treatment is difficult.
Having eight elements, such as is an important factor in carrying out a biological weapons attack with the intention of destroying the other country.
Each detailed explanation may seem unnecessary, but in short, if there is an ideal biological weapon with all eight conditions, it is enough to destroy the national economy, and it will be inevitable that panic will occur. Biological weapons are not only lethal, but also the propagation power is important, and it is necessary to have a mechanism that makes the other country suspicious from the purpose of causing the enemy country to collapse economically.
There is a person who does not develop with the onset person, death with a high probability when developing, those who do not develop one side, that spread the virus as a virus carrier is ideal as a biological weapon attack, it is advantageous to disturbance in the other country.
Well, the organization that comes to Japan such an attack, but I want to think that there is no country, in reality, considering that there was a subway sarin incident (attack by chemical weapons in the metropolitan area), etc., the occult terminal group, even if it is not a country, There is still a possibility that biological weapons close to ideals will be completed and scattered.
Of course, it is very difficult to have all eight conditions, but it would be necessary to prepare for being attacked by such a thing.
Recently, the possibility of encountering an unknown virus has also been raised by global warming. They may be different from attacks, but may have the same effect, and may encounter something close to eight conditions, as this time.
The new corona (5) is fatally missing, which is still better in that regard. Therefore, there is a feeling that the vigilance was sweet, too. However, if the virus is the same as this time, and the mortality rate after onset is high, would it be a do? Or, if the mortality rate seems not to be high at first, and the condition is prolonged, and in fact, the mortality rate is high, and, in the case where the condition is so severe, there is no treatment other than hospitalization, and as a result, it leads to medical collapse, What if it is such a virus?
In any case, even this time, it will be even worse because it is noisy when it becomes a catastrophic situation.
Therefore, there will be a good need to prepare for the next one as a lesson.
Now, the lessons of the present situation seem to be at least less.
1. Government stockpile of essentials such as masks and disinfectants
It is the same as a disaster, and individual preparation is important, but it is also important to prepare for the government. There has been a shortage of masks this time, but the government should purchase a certain amount of money every year to prevent such a mask from happening, and have a government stockpile. It is desirable to stockpile items that can be considered, such as disinfectant as well as masks. There is originally a disaster stockpile about this, so if you take advantage of that scheme, it will be done smoothly.
2. Securing emergency wards
This time, the lack of emergency isolation facilities was also a problem.
Therefore, there is a story that the government will build 50 luxury hotels, but why not prepare this as a designated isolation facility and to be used as an isolation facility in case of emergency? As long as it's not a very anti-government thinking, "I've been isolated in a place like this!" If it is a luxury hotel, it will not be said, and if it is a luxury hotel, the isolation ability will be high. It might be a hand to have the BC weapon defense equipment, the anti-virus filter, etc. more than the equipped individual air conditioning on the assumption that it is possible to use it in the isolation facility if possible. It's rather eerie, but I feel like I can sell the safest hotel in the world. It's impossible (cost-wise) like a luxury hotel equipped with such equipment outside of government construction, but it also means building a government. In an emergency, it is necessary to leave the government by compensation (compensation and transportation expenses to return), etc., but I feel that there is a possibility if it is such a case from the beginning.
I think that it is important as a lesson of this time because it is necessary to secure the ward which can be used in an emergency even if the hotel is indeed a blown proposal, and this is difficult only in the government.
By the way, the full-time rate of individual nuclear shelters is also low in Japan. This kind of emergency response is not good for Japanese people, so I have no choice but to ask the government. Because the disaster stockpile is made even if there is a defect once, it is necessary to think about the emergency defense including the nuclear shelter etc. in the same way.
3. Absence and inadequacy of response plan
It seems to be a big thing that there was a plan only though there were various deficiencies this time.
Bureaucratic organizations will not work well without that.
It was revealed that it was necessary to create guidelines, etc., and to some extent a system that could move systemate cistetech, and that there was a shortage in the existing ones.
Using this lesson as a lesson, how to protect Japanese people overseas and what to do about tourists in Japan. What would you do if you were to become a pandemic? At what time do you respond to (e.g. setting up a reference example of the cancellation criteria for an event, conducting movement regulations, etc. at any level, reviewing and maintaining compliant laws and regulations, etc.) it is necessary to review it again and to revise the point that there was a deficiency.
As you may say about the emergency clauses, there are a variety of names, such as pandemic response plans, pandemic action plans, pandemic response BCPs, and pandemic action plans. First of all, I want everyone who lives in Pandemonium to consider the conspiracy plan (although I know that this is the most difficult), and even if I throw it round to the bureaucrat after all, I want you to throw it properly.
It should be seen heavily that there was a failure of the response plan rather than a legal deficiency, and the bureaucrat who responded before the new Corona death had committed suicide. If the correspondence plan is put up neatly, and it is not enough, and "such a law is necessary" appears, it might be good to try to legislate by the content at that time. Given that it is unlikely that the ideal legal development environment and policy environment will be aligned in the First Pandemo2um, it is necessary to carefully submit in mind that the proposed law will be transformed by the political situation. After all, it is easy to be made a tool of the power plot and the political strife of The Pandemo2um because it is a tool of the power plot and the political strife of pandemotwoum because it is a work, and it is common for the inhabitants of Pandemo2um to do so because it is a kind of human rights regulation after all. Beyond the partisanship" and there is a need to be aware that it is also very familiar with the meaningless jokes), I think that it would be better to make it a practical solution and a practical administrative law that does not happen.
That is the lesson in the present situation.
It seems to be necessary to draw out the lesson thinking that the virus comes though it is unavoidable to make a lot of noise (although it seems to be a factor of the water's edge operation failure that the expert had a sweet idea of coronata, too).
